Transplantation is the treatment of choice for ESRD patients in ADPKD if there are no contraindications to Surgery or Immunosuppression. Routine pre transplant evaluation for colonic diverticula or intracranial aneurysm is not required in asymptomatic subjects. Nephrectomy is not routinely indicated in ADPKD patient. It is restricted to patients with a history of recurrent cyst infection , recurrent major bleeding ,complicated lithiasis , severe Hypertension ,or massive renal enlargement ,concomitant with renal transplantation When living related donor is considered a screening test should be done to completely eliminate the possibility that the donor will develop ADPKD in future .For potential donors aged older than 30 years ultrasound abdomen is sufficient for screening , whereas in potential donor aged younger than 30 years absence of cyst will not exclude the development of ADPKD. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging may be used for such patients in renal cyst detection. Genetic linkage analysis is a highly sensitive method and is used in donor screening if imaging studies fail.
ADPKD, Genetic Evaluation
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is generally a late onset multisystem disorder characterized by bilateral renal cysts. Cysts in other organs include the liver, seminal vesicles ,pancreas, and arachnoid membrane .Vascular abnormality include intracranial aneurysms ,dilatation of aortic root, dissection of the thoracic aorta, mitral valve prolapsed ,and abdominal wall hernias. Renal manifestations include hypertension, renal pain, and renal insufficiency. ADPKD is the most common potentially lethal single-gene disorder. Its prevalence at birth is between 1:400 and 1:1000. It is the most common of all inherited renal diseases, with around 12.5 million cases worldwide. About 45% of them by age 45. In ADPKD progress to end stage renal disease by age 60 . 4.4% of patients requiring renal replacement therapy have ADPKD .
ADPKD is caused by mutations in atleast two different genes, PKD1 and PKD2
Renal Transplant in Adpkd
Renal transplant is the treatment of choice in ADPKD with end stage renal disease if there are no contraindications to surgery or immunosuppressive therapy.
Pre Transplant Evaluation of Recipient
From routine evaluation apart, the other investigation required is Abdominal computed tomography, Cardiac Assessment including Echocardiograph, myocardial stress scintigraphy and if required coronary and aortoiliac angiography. Routine screening for previous asymptomatic patients for diverticular disease is not recommended , but pre transplant elective colonic resection should be considered in patients with symptomatic ,severe diverticular disease. Screening for intracranial aneurysm is not recommended but patients with a previously ruptured intracranial aneurysm or with family history should be screened.
Pre Transplant Nephrectomy
Glassman et al  have suggested that bilateral nephrectomy reduces the symptoms and provides more space for the graft. Braza et al  observed higher graft and patient survival rates among ADPKD patients who had undergone a pre transplant unilateral nephrectomy than those without nephrectomy. But with advancement in Antihypertensive medications, Antibiotics, painkillers and transfusion medicine, fewer kidneys have needed to be removed. Advantages in maintaining native kidneys in this disease is avoiding fluid overload, congestive heart failure, Hyperkalemia , anemia , and renal Osteodystrophy.  Nephrectomy is now restricted to patients with a history of recurrent cyst infection, recurrent bleeding, complicated lithiasis , severe hypertension or massive renal enlargement . At present general consensus is pretransplant native kidneys should not be removed especially bilateral nephrectomy should be avoided  Fuller et al have evaluated the outcome of pre transplant, concomitant and post-transplant native nephrectomy in patients with ADPKD and demonstrated that concomitant native nephrectomy compares favorably than others in terms of morbidity and hospitalization. More recently, laproscopic nephrectomy has been used in ADPKD patients who require nephrectomy prior to transplant. The advantages of Laproscopic nephrectomy are more rapid patient recovery and shorter hospitalization. There is no evidence for increased risk for renal cell carcinoma developing in native ADPKD kidneys after renal transplantation. Hence pre transplant nephrectomy is not indicated as cancer prophylaxis.
Evaluation of Donor
Living related Donor transplant has several advantages over cadaver donor by having better immunological matching, longer graft half-life, shorter cold ischemic time and avoiding hemodialysis by preemptive transplant  However, patients with ADPKD have limited options for live related kidneys as their families are at a risk for developing ADPKD. A screening test should be done to completely eliminate the possibility that the donor will develop ADPKD in future. The pretest probability (prevalence) of disease in the study cohort has a significant impact on the performance of any diagnostic test. Individuals who have an affected first-degree relative have a 50% probability of ADPKD at birth, the risk for those who present later for diagnosis testing is not constant but diminishes with age. With increasing age, more affected individuals will have received a clinical diagnosis because of their symptoms (e.g. hypertension, hematuria, flank pain from cyst rupture of passage of stone, urinary tract infection), while those who Seek diagnostic testing will be those who are affected but have clinically undiagnosed disease or are at risk but are unaffected. The pretest probability of disease at any time point can be estimated by the ratio of those who are affected but have clinically undiagnosed disease to the total pool of at-risk individuals who seek diagnostic testing. The pretest probability of disease at birth is 50% for individuals who are at risk for PKD1 and PKD2 but begins to diverge beyond second decade of life because PKD1 is a more severe and symptomatic disease. For potential donors aged older than 30 years the approach is that first establish by imaging-Abdominal ultrasound, CT, or MRI of the kidneys
Ravine, 1994 sonographic criteria: (individuals known to be at 50% risk for the disease)
Large echogenic kidneys without distinct macroscopic cysts in an infant/child at 50% risk for ADPKD are diagnostic.
In an individual with a positive family history of ADPKD:
In the absence of a family history of ADPKD, the presence of bilateral renal enlargement and cysts with/without the presence of hepatic cysts and the absence of other manifestations suggestive of a different renal cystic disease provide presumptive, but not definite, evidence for the diagnosis. For potential donors aged older than 30 years ultrasound abdomen, which is sensitive, inexpensive and noninvasive for screening and has negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. In potential donor aged younger than 30 years, detection by ultrasound of single cyst in one kidney is sufficient to exclude them as donor, but absence of cyst will not exclude the development of ADPKD as there is 10% false-negative rate; negative predictive value is 90.5% and sensitivity of 88.5% in this patient group. Thus, 1 in 25 donors aged younger than 30 years with a negative ultrasound evaluation result will subsequently develop ADPKD type1. In families with ADPKD 2, with ESRD typically occurring later than in ADPKD1, the NPV of ultrasonographic screening is only 68% for family members aged younger than 30 years Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can also be used for renal cyst detection. Because of their increased anatomical resolution they are more sensitive than ultrasound in screening for currently detail the sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of CT and MRI in screening at-risk family members for ADPKD.  In contrast to ultrasound, however no robust studies currently detail the sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of CT and MRI in screening at-risk family members for ADPKD  Heavily T2-weighted MRI (HT2MRI) may offer several advantages over ultrasound and CT as well for screening related kidney donors in families with ADPKD. Ultrasound can detect cysts of 1.0 cm, and CT with intravenous contrast, cysts of 0.5 cm. HT2MRI can detect cysts of 0.3 cm in diameter. HT2MRI may also be more sensitive than CT  HT2MRI and CT are more expensive than ultrasound when used solely for excluding the diagnosis of ADPKD.  HT2MRI could also have disadvantage when ultrasound, HT2MRI may have a greater false-positive rate for cyst detection. An early false positive test result may cause considerable anxiety and psychological harm to the young patient
It is used to confirm the ADPKD in pre symptomatic individual with large number of affected family members (Algorithm). Linkage testing is not available to families with a single affected individual, and linkage testing may be complicated if a de novo mutation has occurred recently in the family. Linkage testing is not available to families with a single affected individual, and linkage testing may be complicated if a de novo mutation has occurred recently in the family. Testing of at least 2 or more known affected family members and 2-3 generations is required to establish is linkage.
Parents of a Proband
Sibs of Proband
Offspring of a Proband
Other family members of the Proband
Most of the affected individuals have one affected parent
If a parent is affected ;the risk to sibs is 50%
Every child has a 50% chance of inheriting the mutation
The risk to other family members depend on the genetic status of the proband’s parents. If a parents is affected or has a disease-causing mutation, his or her relative are at risk
When renal image analysis suggests that the parents are unaffected and the disease-causing mutation found in the proband cannot be detected in the DNA of either parent, the disease in the proband is likely caused by de novo mutation and the risk to sibs is small.
De novo mutations occurs in 5- 10%
Connor et al(2008) reported mosaicism
Algorithm: Proband, what next…..?
Evaluation of other member Molecular genetic testing of younger individuals who are at risk for adult-onset disorders for which no treatment exists is not considered appropriate, because it produces psychological trauma to the individuals. Molecular testing is not useful in predicting age of onset, severity, type of symptoms, or rate of progression in asymptomatic individuals Molecular genetic testing (sequence analysis) can be used to confirm or establish the diagnosis when it is uncertain and confirmation is required, for example potential living related kidney donor, at-risk pregnancies, early-onset disease in sibling Various molecular genetic methods i. Sequence analysis ii. Linkage analysis iii. Deletion/duplication Various methods: DHPLC method, quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA), or array GH, SURVEYOR nuclease method When mutation analysis of PKD1 and PKD2 by sequencing is negative, deletion/duplication analysis of PKD2 should be considered In 2002, complete mutation screen of PKD1 and PKD2 was done by using DHPLC method. Deletions /duplications are not readily detectable by sequence analysis of genomic DNA; the tests used are polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-quantitative, long-range, multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA), or array GH. Ying-Cai Tan et al described a novel method for genomic analysis of PKD1 and PKD2 mutations, i.e. “SURYEYOR nuclease method” that was comparable to direct sequence gor detecting ADPKD mutation achieving higher sensitivity with lower cost, proving and important tool for genetic analysis of complex genes.. Molecular genetic testing is not useful in predicting age of onset severity, type of symptoms or of progression in asymptomatic individuals. The family history may appear to be negative because of failure to recognize the disorder in family members, early death of the parent before the onset of symptoms, or late onset of the disease in the affected parent. Genetic linkage analysis is a highly sensitive method of donor screening, with 99% accuracy in the diagnosis of ADPKD and an NPV of almost 100%. Unfortunately, it is both costly and time consuming. Furthermore, many individuals do not wish to be tested, preferring not to know if they are at risk for ADPKD. Recently, mosaicism in ADPKD revealed by genetic testing has been used to enable living renal transplantation. Due to the shortage of available donor kidneys, some authors have suggested the use of less than perfect organs including kidneys showing the early effects of polycystic kidney disease.This is based on the estimated time for the donor kidney to fail and the graft survival period on immunosupperssion.  Selection criteria for polycystic kidney donors have been proposed which include donor age <50, normal donor creatinine at the time of retrieval, acceptable pretransplant renal biopsy, normal or only mildly enlarged kidney size (>15cm), and appropriately informed recipient who may have life expectancy of 10 years or less.  Only 12 recipients of an ADPKD transplant kidney have been reported and Eng et al have reported the longest 15- years follow –up of ADPKD donor kidney transplantation. The major concern with transplantation of ADPKD donor kidneys is the risk of cyst growth and, ultimately progression to renal failure.Some authors suggested that the natural course of disease progression is slowed or arrested once the donor organ is transplanted. Previous reports also showed that polycystic kidneys with normal renal function and preserved renal cortical mass could be used for transplantation and disappearance of cyst may even occur as reported by Spees.  Other potential risks associated with donor polycystic kidneys include bleeding and infection, particularly when renal transplant is biopsied. Olsburgh et al have reported pyelonephritis in the setting of multiple percutaneous biopsies. 50 Considering the quality of life with a good functioning kidney and the shortage of donors, a polycystic kidney with good renal Function may be used as a donor kidney. However, imaging every 2 to 3 years to follow cyst progression is recommended in these individuals.
- Dalgaard OZ.Bilateral Polycystic disease of the kidneys: a follow up of two hundred and eighty –four patients and their families .Acta Med Scand 1957 ; 328:332
- Iglesias CG,Torres VE ,Offord KP , et al. Epidemiology of adult Polycystic kidney
- Disease, Olmsted county, Minnesota: 1935 – 1980.Am j Kidney Dis 1983:2:630
- USRDS .Annual Data Report 2008; 3:7
- Harris PC.Annu Rev Med 2009;60:321-37
- Dominguez FE, Albrecht K, Heemann U, et al. Prevalence of divericulosis and incidence of bowel perforation after kidney transplantation in patients with polycystic kidney disease. Transl Int 1998; 11:28.
- Pirson Y, Christopher JL, Goffin E. Outcome of renal replacement therapy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Nephrol dial transplant 1996
- McCune TR, Nylander WA, Van Buren DH, et al. Colonic screening prior to renal transplantation and its impact on post-transplant colonic complications. Clin Tranpant 1992.
- Hadimeri H, Norden G, Friman S, et al. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in a kidney transplant population.1997.
- Pirson Y, Chauveau D.ADPKD-associated intracranial aneurysm: new insights and unanswered questions. Contrib. nephrol 1995.
- Pirson Y, Chauveau, Verellen-Dumoulin c, et al. intracranial aneurysms in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in a kidney int.1994
- Lazarus JM, Bailey gl, Hmapers CL, et al. Hemodialysis and transplantation in adults with polycystic renal disease JAMA 1995.
- Ho-Hsieh H, Novick AC, Steinmuller D, et al. renal transplantation for endstage polycystic kidney disease urology 1987.
- Glassman dt, Nipkow L, Bartlett ST, et al.Bilateral nephrctomy with concomitant renal graft transplantation for autosomal domin ant polycystic kidney disease URO 2000.
- Brazda E, Ofner D, Riedmann B, et al. The effect of nephrctomy on the outcome of renal transplantation in patients with polycystic kidney disease.ANN Transplant 1996.
- Rozansk J, Kozlowska I, Myslak M, et al. Pretransplant nephrctomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Transplant 2005.
- Pirson Y, Cochat p, Goffin E, Treatment of patients with hereditary and congential disorders. In: Jacobs C, ED. Opttimal Treatment Strategies in End stage Renal Failure Oxford University Pres, 2002, 205-28.
- Gatalica Z, Schwariting R, Petersen RO, Renal cell carcinoma in the presence of adult polycystic kidney disease.uro 1994.43:103
- Fitzpartrick PM, Torres VE, Charboneau JW, et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. am J kidney Dis 1990;15:535-43.
- Salvatierra O JR, Wolfson M, Cochrum K, et al. end stage polycystic kidney disease: management by renal transplantation and selective use of preliminary nephrectomy.j urol 1976;115:5
- Knispel HH,KLAN R, Offermann G, et al. transplantation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease without nephrectomy ,urol int 1996;
- Fuller TF, Brennan TV, FENG S, et al. end stage polycystic kidney disease: indications and timing of native nephrectomy relative to kidney transplantations’ UROL2005.
- Bia MJ, Ramos EL, Danovitch GM, et al. Evaluation of living renal donors. The current practice of US transplant centers.transpl 1995.
- Alfani D, Pretagonistini R, Bruzzone P, et al. Kidney transplantation from living unrelated donors. Clin transpl 1998.
- Fletcher r, Fletcher s, Wagner e. diagnostic test .in:clinical Epidemiology-the Essentials Baltimore; Lippincott Williams and wikkins,2003:41-58
- Nicolau c, Torra R, Badenas C, et al. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease types 1 and 2 : Assessment of US sensitivity for diagnosis.radiology 1999.
- Parfrey PS, Bear JC, Morgan J, et al. the diagnosis and prognosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease .n eng j med 1990.
- Meziane MA , Fishman EK, Goldman SM,ET al.computed tomography of high density renal cysts in adult polycystic kidney disease j compute asst tomography 1986;10:767
- Kariainen H, Jaskelainnen J, kivisaari L, et.al. dominant and recessive polycystic kidney disease in children: classification by intravenous pyelography, ultrasound, and computed tomography padia radiol :1988 ;18:45-50
- Semelka RC, kelehkis NL, thomasson D, et al. HASTE MR imaging; description of technique and preliminary result in the abdomen. J Magn reson imaging 1996.
- Zand M, Strange J, Dumlao M,et al. screening a living kidney donor for polycystic kidney disease using heavily T2 – weighted MRI. American journal of kidney disease 2001.
- PeiY ,He N, Wang K et al .A Spectrum of mutations in the Polycystic kidney disease -2 (PKD 2)gene fromeight Canadian kindreds.J Am Soc Nephrol 1998;9:1853 -60
- Hateboer N, Van dijk MA, Bogdanova N, et al. Comparision of Phenotypes of Polycystic kidney disease typrs 1 and 2 .European PKD 1-PKD 2 Study group.Lancet 1999;353:103-7
- Ying - Cai Tan,et al. Human Mutation 2009 ;30:264-73.
- Connora A, luntb PW, Dllingc C, et-al. Mosacism in autosomal dominate polycystic kidney disease revealed by genetic testing to enable to living related renal transplantation.american journal of transplantation 2008.
- Howard RJ, Reed AL, Vander Werfwj, et.al.development of polycystic disease in kidney 10 years after transplantation. Transplantation 1999.
- Shaan Y-S,Lee P-C,SY ED,et al. polycystic kidney patient as a cadaveric donor is it appropriate ? nephro dial 2001.
- Spees EK, Orlowski JP, schorr WJ et al.successfull use of ploycystic kidney .transplant proc 1990.
- Koene RA .should polycystic kidneys ever be used for renal transplant? nephrol dial transplant 2001.
- Olsburgh JD, Godbole HC, O’ Donnell PJ, et al.transplantation of kineys from diseased adult polycystic donor. AM J transpl 2006?
- Manicni G,C amparini L,Saladori M. transplant of a polycystic kidney because of organshortage transplant proc1990
- Sega B.the tolycystic kidney donor. transplantation 1992