Liver damage is one of the most common consequences of alcohol abuse but despite of an enormous amount of research efforts, the mechanism by which alcohol causes alcoholic liver diseases remains unknown. Evidence that association is independent of both alcohol consumption and changes in other liver function tests suggest that possible mechanisms beyond alcohol neurotoxicity and hepatic dysfunction deserve further investigation (Michael 1989) The present study was envisioned to carry out Biochemical studies of alcohol induced liver injury in the alcoholic patient with following aims and objects.
i. To determine the effect of alcohol on liver function
ii. To know effect of alcohol on lipid profile.
iii. To know the quantity, quality and duration of alcohol intake in relation to liver damage and change in lipid metabolism.
iv. To observe the effect of diet in liver damage in alcoholic.
Alcohol, Liver Injury
Enjoy a drink? Even scientist admit that an occasional alcoholic beverage may be enjoyed without harmful effects. It may not do good, but it will not impair health either. It is really a question of the amount consumed and the frequency with which one drinks plus the individuals own metabolism. Every bit of alcohol burned in the tissues creates a nutritional demand for carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals, and other elements necessary to process it. If one has reserve of all those necessary elements then he is better off than the person who doesn’t. (A.M Chut Nutritional moves Jan – Mar 1998). Most of the alcohol which is absorbed (90%) is metabolized in the liver. There are three main enzyme systems involved in the initial oxidation of alcohol, all of which produce Acetaldehyde as the primary metabolic product
(i) Alcohol dehydrogenase in the cytosol.
(ii) MEOs (Microsomal ethanol oxidizing system) on the smooth endoplasmic reticulum and
(iii) Catalase and hydrogen peroxide in the mitochondria and preoxisomes.
These reactions generate reduced NAD in the hepatocytes. In the presence of continuous alcohol abuse, an increase in the ratio NADH/NAD which changes the redox potential of the hepatocytes with consequential effects on other metabolic processes such as lipid and carbohydrate metabolism (Lieber, C.S.1985) The three principal alcohol induced hepatic injury are designated as
(i) Alcoholic fatty liver (ii) Alcoholic hepatitis (iii) Alcoholic cirrhosis.
The deranged metabolic processes caused by alcoholic abuse produce the histological picture on liver biopsy which is recognized as alcoholic fatty liver or hepatic steatosis. In contrast to hepatic steatosis, in acute alcoholic hepatitis there is a true inflammatory process in the liver and it is well recognized that this is a processor of cirrhosis. Cirrhosis can also develop insidiously without the occurrence of a clinically recognizable episode of alcoholic hepatitis.
Materials & Methods
The present study was carried out on 250 patients suffering from alcoholic liver diseases in the OPD at Biran Devi Modi Zanana Hospital, Hapur during last 3 years. Remarkable conclusion were drawn on the basis of dietary intake, serum lipid profile, liver function tests, gutamy transferase and prothrombin time elaboration. Fifty normal healthy controls in the age group below 30 to above 50 years were taken.Blood samples were collected to carry out estimations before the treatment was initiated an after 15 days, 1month, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month of treatment.
i.The maximum number of cases included in the study were in third to fifth decade of life,
ii. It was observed that incidence of alcoholic liver disease was maximum and sustained a high level during adulthood.
Only males were included in this study as in India there is male preponderance in consumption of alcohol.
Observations & Results
i. Maximum number of cases were observed in third of fifth decade of life
ii. It was observed that incidence of ALD attained its peak growth during adulthood. The decline was observed only in fatty liver type of cases at the later part of life.
Only males were included in the study
From this study it appears that fatty liver had higher intake of protein than alcoholic hepatitis and alcoholic cirrhotics, but no difference in alcohol calories in all the three group was noticed, It infers that high intake of alcohol reduces further the available nutrients because the alcoholics derive the large amount of calories from the alcohol.
i.Serum cholesterol was found to be raised in fatty liver and alcoholic hepatitis which came to normal after treatment, where as in alcohol cirrhosis it was found low and the patient did not show the normal results even after treatment for two years.
ii. Patients suffering from alcoholic liver diseases had low levels of HDLc and LDLc. Patients could not show significant change after treatment except for fatty liver.
iii. Elevated levels of VLDLc were observed in all the three types of alcoholic liver diseases. It did not come up to normal range after treatment in alcoholic cirrhosis.
iv. Level of triglyceride were raised in fatty liver whereas the levels were much low in alcoholic hepatitis and alcoholic cirrhosis. Patients suffering from fatty liver returned to normal state after treatment.
It is well recognized from the present study that large amounts of alcohol intake has adverse effects not only on the liver but on all tissues of the body including the cardiovascular system, and it is generally agreed that such high intake are not associated with protection against coronary heart disease (Devenji et.al 1980).
Liver Function Tests
In this study the liver function tests may help in assessing the prognosis and therapeutic response of individual patients. It may provide a valuable tool in evaluation of clinical laboratory effects of treatments. It is well recognized from the present study that large amounts of alcohol intake has adverse effects not only on the liver but on all tissues of the body including the cardiovascular system, and it is generally agreed that such high intake are not associated with protection against coronary heart disease (Devenji et. Al. 1980). The present study is a contribution towards the stride of biochemical research that will help physicians to conquer the disease.
- A.M. Chut Nutritional moves Jan – Mar 1998.
- Lieber, C.S. 1985.
- Scheffuer, F, Popper H (1970) and Galambos, J. T. et. al. (2005)
- Christofferson P, Neilseu K. (2002)
- Bhathal P.S Wilkinson P, et. al. (1975) and Fellon H.J. Hoyumpa A.M., Green H.L.
- Kristenson H, Trell E, Fex G 1980, Papoz L, Warnets M (1981)
- Casting – Lioni 1947, Glenn and Grafe 1966.
- ZAK et. al. ,2001
- Wilson and Spiger, 1973
- Van Handel and Zilversmith, 1957
- Persijin et. al. 1976, szasz et. al.1974
- Malloy and Evelyn, 1937
- Kind and king, 1954
- Rietman and Frankel, 1957
- Sunderman et. al. , 1958
- Bartholomew and Delaney, 1966
- Boehringer knoll and Span diagnostics.
- Mohan D. And Sharma H.K. 1984.
- Won Warbarg, J.P. and Buchler R in 1984
- Frank D, Raichi, RP 1985
- Lilienfeld AM, Korn RF 1950
- Tenis M et. al. In 1967
- Tokuhata G.K. Digon E. Ramaswamy K. In 197
- Patek AJ Jr, Post J, Ranoff OD et. al. In 1948
- Lelback et. al. in 1967
- Wilkinson et. al. in 1969
- Devenji et. Al. (1980)