Infections with ESBL K. pneumoniae are increasing, particularly among patients in ICUs. This pathogen is usually multidrug-resistant and there are limited treatment options available. Active surveillance for ESBLproducing pathogens in high-risk populations should be performed using appropriate antimicrobial techniques. Disease progression has occurred while on treatment with antibiotics to which there is in vitro susceptibility. The carbapenems, that is, imipenem and Meropenam, are safe and effective antibiotics for the treatment of severe ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae infection in preterm infants
K. Pneumonia, patients, infection, carbapenems, imipenem, Meropenam
Bacteria belonging to the genus Klebsiella frequently cause human nosocomial infections. Among these Klebsiella pneumoniae is medically accounts for a significant proportion of hospitalacquired urinary tract infections, pneumonia, septicaemias, and soft tissue infections (Poddschun and Ullmann 1998). The term hospital infection, hospital acquired infection or nosocomial infections are applied to infections developing in hospitalised patients, not present or in incubation at the time of their admission. Such infections may become evident during their stay in hospital or sometimes, only after their discharge. The genus Klebsiella consists of nonmotile, capsulated gram negative rods that grow well on ordinary media forming large, domeshaped, mucoid colonies of varying degree of stickiness. The principal pathogenic reservoirs for transmission of Klebsiella are the gastrointestinal tract and the hands of hospital personnel. Because of their ability to spread rapidly in the hospital environment, these bacteria tend to cause nosocomial outbreaks. Hospital outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella spp., especially those in neonatal wards, are often caused by new types of strains, the so-called extended-spectrum-β- lactamase (ESBL) producers. The incidence of ESBL-producing strains among clinical Klebsiella isolates has been steadily increasing over the past years. The resulting limitations on the therapeutic options demand new measures for the management of Klebsiella hospital infections. While the different typing methods are useful epidemiological tools for infection control (Ananthanarayan and Panikar 2009). Reported carrier rates in hospitalized patients are 77% in the stool, 19% in the pharynx, and 42% on the hands of patients (Cook et.al 1979, Devis et.al 1974).The high rate of nosocomial Klebsiella colonization appears to be associated with the use of antibiotics rather than with factors connected with delivery of care in the hospital (Pollack et.al 1972, Rose and Schreierl 1968). Apart from medical equipment (contaminated due to faulty hygienic procedures) and blood products (Goetz et.al 1995, Jumaa 1992) the principal reservoirs for transmission of Klebsiella in the hospital setting are the gastrointestinal tract of patients and the hands of hospital personnel. Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram negative bacilli that produce extended-spectrum -lactamase (ESBL) enzymes have been reported with increasing frequency in intensive-care units and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is made by culturing appropriate specimen and identifying the isolate by biochemical reaction. Antibiotics sensitivity should invariably be done. Many strains carry plasmids determining multiple drug resistance (Ananthanarayan and Panikar 2009).
Numerous virulence factors have been described in Klebsiella spp. Extracellular capsules are essential to virulence; (Cryz et.al 1984, Domenico et.al 1982)the capsular material forms thick bundles of fibrillous structures that cover the bacterial surface in massive layers. This protects the bacterium from phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear granulocytes and prevents killing by bactericidal serum factors via the complement-mediated cascade.
Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance
Resistance to antimicrobials is a natural biological phenomenon. The introduction of every antimicrobial agent into clinical practice has been followed by the detection in the laboratory of strains of microorganisms that are resistant, i.e. able to multiply in the presence of drug concentrations higher than the concentrations in humans receiving therapeutic doses (Koneman et.al 1997).
Extended-Spectrum B-Lactamase (ESBL producer)
ESBLs are inhibitor- susceptibility enzyme in classes A and D that arise by mutations in genes for common plasmid – encoded B-Lactamas, such as TEM-1, SHV-1, and OXA-10. ESBLS may confer resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins and aztreonam in clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, E. coli, P. mirabilis, and other genera of the family Enterobacteriaceae (CLSI 2012).
The AmpC B-lactamases are chromosomal or plasmid-encoded enzymes. Bacteria expressing AmpC enzyme test as resistant to Cefoxitin, penicillins, cephalosporins and aztreonam (CLSI 2012).
Carbapenemase activity in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae occurs as a result of Blactamase enzyme in Classes A, B, and D. KPC-type enzymes within Classes A, NDM-type enzymes within Class B, and OXA-type enzymes within class D represent major families of clinical importance. The presence of KPC- type enzymes can be confirmed using the modified Hodge test (CLSI 2012).
NDM-1 (New Delhi metallo-betalactamase)
Originally described from New Delhi in 2009, this gene is now widespread in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from India and Pakistan. As of mid-2010, NDM-1 carrying bacteria have been introduced to other countries (including the USA and UK), presumably by medical tourists undergoing surgery in India. Inhibitor- Resistant beta-Lactamases. NDM-type and other metallo-B-lactamase enzymes require zinc for activity and are inhibited by substance such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), which binds zinc (CLSI 2010).
(a) Patients at high-risk for ESBL and Carbapenemase include:
(b) Consider screening of all admissions to high risk units. high risk unit include
Measures to control infection
Infection Control Strategies
To control the spread of ESBL-producing pathogens, appropriate infection control interventions should be implemented for all patients who are infected or colonized with ESBLproducing bacteria.
Materials and Methods
Clinical Specimen collection:( Bagley et.al, 1978)
Patients included in the study were given a sterile, dry, container and request for 10-20 ml specimen. The first urine passed by the patient at the beginning of the day was collected for examination (clean catch, mid stream).
Pus and wound swab
A sterile technique was applied to aspirate or collect pus or wound swab from abscess or wound infection, either by disposable syringe or by sterile swab stick. Specimen was collected in a sterile container before an antiseptic dressing is applied. Special care was taken to avoid contamination with commensal organisms from the skin.
Specimen from respiratory tract
From the Bloodstream
Blood is collected by a strict aseptic technique. The skin is cleaned with 70% alcohol and the specimen is collected using a sterile syringe in Blood culture bottle.
Inoculation of samples
All samples were routinely cultured on MacConkey and blood agar plates. These plates were routinely incubated at 37°C aerobically and after overnight incubation, they were checked for bacterial growth.
Isolation and identification of organisms (Mena 2006)
Suspected Gram negative organisms were identified by colony characteristics, Gram staining, motility, citrate utilization, indole production, MR-VP, Urease production, and sugar fermentation reactions .Triple sugar iron agar was used for sugar and H2S production,
Antimicrobial susceptibility test by modified Kirby – bauer sensitivity testing methods
The Kirby-bauer method are the most commonly used disc diffusion methods. The method most commonly employed is to use filter paper discs, impregnated with antibiotics. Results are reported as susceptible, intermediately susceptible or resistant to the different drugs.
Inoculation of isolated bacteria and placement of discs
Modified Kirby-Bauer sensitivity testing method was used for this purpose. Muller Hinton agar media was used, which has PH 7.2-7.4. Media was transfer in to 90 mm diameter sterile Petri dishes to a depth of 4 (four) mm. The surface was lightly and uniformly inoculated by cotton swab in three directions rotating the plate approximately 600, to ensure even distribution. Prior to inoculation, the swab stick was dipped into bacterial suspension having visually equivalent turbidity to 0.5 McFarland standards.
Screening tests for ESBLs production
Isolates is screen for ESBL production by using disc Diffusion of cefotaxime , ceftazidime , ceftriaxone and Aztreonam placed on inoculated plates containing Muller Hinton agar according to the CLSI recommendations. Isolates showing inhibition zone size of ≤ 22 mm with ceftazidime (30 µg), ≤ 25 mm with ceftriaxone (30 µg), ≤27 mm with cefotaxime (30 µg) , ≤ 27 mm with Aztreonam (30 µg) were suspected for ESBL production. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control
Confirmatory test for ESBLs production
In this test a disc of ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30µg) alone and a disc of ceftazidime and cefotaxime in combination with clavulanic acid (30/10 µg) were used for each isolates. Both the discs were placed 25 mm apart, centre to centre, on a lawn culture of the test isolate on Muller Hinton agar plate and incubated overnight at 370 C. A ≥5 mm increase in zone diameter for either antimicrobial agent tested in combination with clavulanic acid versus its zone when tested alone was designated as ESBL positive.
Screening test for Carbapenemase production
Isolates are screen for Carbapenemase production by using disc Diffusion of Meropenem placed on inoculated plates containing Muller Hinton agar according to the CLSI recommendations. Isolates showing inhibition zone size of 16-21 mm with Meropenam (10 µg) were suspected for Carbapenemase production. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control.
Confirmatory test for Carbapenemase production
Carbapenemase production is detected by the modified Hodge test when the test isolate produces the enzyme and allows growth of a carbapenem susceptible strain (E. coli 25922) towards a carbapenem disk. The result is a characteristics cloverleaf- like indication.
During the study, 170 patients with K. pneumoniae isolates were identified. ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae was detected in 30 of 170 patients (17 %), AmpC Betalactamase producer 109 in 170 patients (64%) and carbapenemase producer 53 in 170 patients (31%). The most frequent sources of infection were blood (18%), pus and wound swab (18 %), respiratory ( 32%) and urinary ( 29%).
Screening of Bacterial Isolates From Different Specimen
Culture Characteristics of Bacterial Isolates
Biochemical Reaction for Identification of Bacterial Strain
Note: All bacterial isolates belongs to Klebsiella pneumoniae according to biochemical reaction
Antibiogram of Bacterial Isolates
Management and treatment of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae infections can be challenging and is evolving. To date, there have been no clinical trials that evaluate the comparative efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of infections caused by these pathogens. The type of ESBL enzyme produced and the site and severity of infection are important considerations in determining antimicrobial therapy (Sirot 1995 & Rice et.al, 1990). Therefore, active surveillance for ESBL-producing organisms is critical to describe fully the local epidemiology of a given institution and/or referring centres.
Currently, the carbapenems, that is, imipenem and meropenem, are the only class of antimicrobials that have consistently been effective against ESBLproducing K. pneumoniae. Carbapenems remain stable in the presence of ESBL enzymes and the small compact size of carbapenems allows easy passage through porin into Gram negative bacilli. Thus, carbapenems are often the preferred antimicrobial agent for the treatment of serious infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms. While imipenem was used to treat severe infections during an outbreak of ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp, its use was associated with the emergence of imipenem-resistance Acinetobacter spp (Sirot 1995). In conclusion, infections with ESBL K. pneumoniae are increasing, particularly among patients in ICUs. This pathogen is usually multidrug-resistant and there are limited treatment options available. Active surveillance for ESBL-producing pathogens in high-risk populations should be performed using appropriate antimicrobial techniques. Disease progression has occurred while on treatment with antibiotics to which there is in vitro susceptibility. The carbapenems, that is, imipenem and meropenem, are safe and effective antibiotics for the treatment of severe ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae infection in preterm infants. To prevent spreading Klebsiella infections between patients, healthcare personnel must follow specific infection control precautions (CDC 2007). These precautions may include strict adherence to hand hygiene and wearing gowns and gloves when they enter rooms where patients with Klebsiella–related illnesses are housed. Healthcare facilities also must follow strict cleaning procedures to prevent the spread of Klebsiella. To prevent the spread of infections, patients also should clean their hands very often, including:
- Ananthanarayan R and Jayaram Panikar C K 2009, 2010, textbook of Microbiology, 8th edition. India: Universities press India private limited.
- Bagley S T, Seidler R J, Talbot H W J, Morrow J E. Isolation of Klebsiellae from within living wood. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978;36:178–185.
- CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility test; Approved StandardEleventh Edition. CLSI document M02-A11. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute -2012.
- CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility test; Approved StandardEleventh Edition. CLSI document M02-A11. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute -2010
- Cooke E M, Pool R, Brayson J C, Edmondson A S, Munro M E, Shinebaum R. Further studies on the source of Klebsiella aerogenes in hospital patients. J Hyg Camb. 1979;83:391–395.
- Cryz S J, Fürer E, Germanier R. Experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae burn wound sepsis: role of capsular polysaccharide. Infect Immun. 1984;43:440–441.
- Davis T J, Matsen J M. Prevalence and characteristics of Klebsiella species: relation to association with a hospital environment. J Infect Dis. 1974; 130:402–405.
- Domenico P, Johanson W G, Straus D C. Lobar pneumonia in rats produced by clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 1982; 37:327–335.
- Goetz A M, Rihs J D, Chow J W, Singh N, Muder R R. An outbreak of infusion-related Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in a liver transplantation unit. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:1501–1503
- Jumaa P, Chattopadhyay B. Pseudobacteraemia with multiply-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae resulting from contamination from the blood gas machine on a neonatal unit. J Hosp Infect. 1992; 22:251–255.
- Konaman Elmer W., Allen Stephen D., Janda William M, Schrecken Bergen Paul C, Winn Washington C. 1997. Colour Atlas and textbook of Diagnostics Microbiology, 55th edition.
- . Mena A. 2006. Characterization of a large outbreak by CTX-M-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and mechanisms leading to in vivo carbapenem resistance development. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2831–2837
- Poddschun R. and Ullmann U., 1998, Klebsiella spp. as Nosocomial Pathogens: Epidemology, Taxonomy, Typing Methods, and Pathogenicity Factors. Clinical Microbiology Reviews oct- 1998; 11(4): 589-603.
- Pollack M, Niemann R E, Reinhardt J A, Charache P, Jett M P, Hardy P H., Jr. Factors influencing colonisation and antibiotic-resistance patterns of gram-negative bacteria in hospital patients. Lancet. 1972; ii:668–671.
- Rice LB, Willey SH, Papanicolaou GA,. Outbreak of ceftazidime resistance caused by extendedspectrum -lactamases at a Massachusetts chronic-care facility. Antimicrob Agents Chemotherapy 1990; 34:2193–2199.
- Rose H D, Schreier J. The effect of hospitalization and antibiotic therapy on the gram-negative fecal flora. Am J Med Sci. 1968; 255:228–236
- Sirot D, De-Champs C, Chanal C, . Translocation of antibiotic resistance determinants including an extended-spectrum -lactamase between conjugative plasmids of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;35:1576–1581.